Defining Manufacturing: Modern Production Blurs the Lines of Economic Value

Thanks to a tip from the NIST-MEP newsletter, we read this new Congressional Research Service report on how the definition of manufacturing may be becoming increasingly outdated.

Traditionally, manufacturing has been defined as the process of physically transforming goods—that is, activities like molding, cutting, processing, and assembly. Many laws, regulations, and trade provisions promoting U.S.-made goods rest on that definition.

But a growing portion of the value of manufactured goods does not lie in this physical transformation. Non-physical inputs like design, research, and software development constitute an increasing share of a good’s value—and also of the employment associated with that good’s production. That trend is expected to continue.

Those jobs, under our current methods of measuring economic activity, are generally not counted as manufacturing jobs. Moreover, the establishments that employ them are often not counted as manufacturing establishments.

At a time when economic policymaking is increasingly concerned with revitalizing U.S. manufacturing and re-shoring manufacturing jobs, this disconnect matters. It has implications for how we measure manufacturing and how we seek to foster the economic benefits of manufacturing activity in our country—and in New York State. Those design, software, business services, and after-sales service jobs matter.

That said, for an economy that has shifted away from manufacturing and toward services over the past several decades, retaining expertise in manufacturing processes remains critical, even if the relative value of those “physical transformation” activities decreases. It’s as important as ever to educate students and the incumbent workforce in next generation manufacturing skills. Our long-term competitiveness depends in part on that expertise, and not divorcing our strength in R&D and design from an ability to remain at the cutting edge of manufacturing processes.

Related Reads from FuzeHub’s Blog

Robotics Institute to Hold Member Meeting
The Advanced Robotics for Manufacturing Institute (ARM Institute) is holdings its first membership meeting in Pittsburgh on November 1-3.  This event
New York MEP Engages with Additional Manufacturing USA Institutes
Manufacturing USA is a network of 14 public-private institutes that each have a distinct technology focus but work toward the
Don’t Miss FuzeHub’s Last Solutions Forum of 2017
FuzeHub’s last Solutions Forum of 2017 is less than two weeks away. This is your final chance to make face-to-face
What Happens at a FuzeHub Solutions Forum?
FuzeHub Solutions Forums are where New York State companies make face-to-face connections with business and technical resources that receive state,
UB receives Center for Advanced Technology designation
A new Center for Advanced Technology has just been designated by Empire State Development. The University at Buffalo Center for Advanced
Faces of Manufacturing in New York State: MPI Systems, Inc.
Founded in 1972, this Hudson Valley company has developed more products and systems than all of its competitors combined. Today,
FuzeHub presents NY MEP program at Conference in Washington, D.C.
This week, FuzeHub's Everton H. Henriques and the New York State Rehabilitation Association (NYSRA) spoke at the 2017 ACCSES Annual Conference. The Conference is an annual
Ask an Expert: Cory Albrecht on Cybersecurity
For this edition of our “Ask an Expert” series, we interviewed Cory Albrecht, director of the Advanced Institute for Manufacturing
Five Factors to Consider When Choosing a Contract Manufacturer
  Contract manufacturers across New York State want your business. Whether you’re an inventor, a maker, or an original equipment

Leave A Comment

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield